Comments on: Damn you, Iowa. You’ve made my magazine inaccurate http://www.johnheronproject.com/wp/?p=954 Some things, which said, cannot be unsaid. Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:10:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: robot hero http://www.johnheronproject.com/wp/?p=954#comment-17285 robot hero Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:02:11 +0000 http://www.johnheronproject.com/wp/?p=954#comment-17285 vermont, too! http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/04/07/national/a072845D15.DTL&type=politics hopefully california will catch up again. vermont, too! http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/04/07/national/a072845D15.DTL&type=politics

hopefully california will catch up again.

]]> By: David Hill http://www.johnheronproject.com/wp/?p=954#comment-17284 David Hill Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:44:11 +0000 http://www.johnheronproject.com/wp/?p=954#comment-17284 In all my debates about this issue, I've never heard a valid supporting argument. My favorite is the argument that, "marriage has had this one definition for thousands of years, why change it now?" An argument that clearly disregards things like historical facts. Where's "turn the other cheek" from these typically religious people? Where's "do unto others?" It's really a hurtful shame to see. In all my debates about this issue, I’ve never heard a valid supporting argument.

My favorite is the argument that, “marriage has had this one definition for thousands of years, why change it now?” An argument that clearly disregards things like historical facts.

Where’s “turn the other cheek” from these typically religious people? Where’s “do unto others?” It’s really a hurtful shame to see.

]]>